Balance the Risk/Return Trade-offs of Selling to a Competitor
We’re currently working with a client who is deeply resistant to the idea of even conducting “blind” outreach to competitors, fearing it could jeopardize his entire business. This mindset stems from guidance provided by a previous M&A advisor who claimed—quite boldly—that one should never sell to the competition under any circumstance. While a healthy degree of caution is wise, completely avoiding competitors can severely limit opportunities for a successful strategic sale.
In this case, the client operates in a high-volume, low-margin commodity space—an industry where differentiation is minimal and pricing takes precedence. Even if buyers and suppliers learned of a potential sale, it’s unlikely their behavior would change, as loyalty in such markets is often price-driven, not relationship-based. For businesses like his, competitors often represent ideal buyers with aligned interests and strong incentives.
However, for companies with more sensitive or differentiated models, the risks of selling to a competitor are greater. These might include:
- Technology firms with proprietary IP
- Staffing agencies, especially those in high-demand fields like software
- Customer-centric service providers.
In these cases, discretion is critical. If a competitor shows interest, sensitive information should only be shared on a strictly need-to-know basis—and only when it’s essential to valuation. Sellers should remain cautious and deliberate when disclosing confidential data that could harm them if a deal doesn’t close.
Understanding the nature of your business—and the associated risks—can help strike the right balance between opportunity and protection in strategic M&A.
The big question is relevance: