Selling To
A Competitor
Preparing to sell a business is challenging on its own—factoring in competitors as potential buyers adds another layer of complexity. While competitors can sometimes offer the highest valuations, selling to them also introduces risks related to confidentiality, employee retention, and long-term business viability.

Whether or not it’s the right move depends on several internal and external factors. It's important to carefully assess motivations, protections, and potential outcomes. Selling to a competitor can present unique opportunities, but it often proves to be a double-edged sword requiring thoughtful strategy and guidance.

Why Sell to a Competitor?

There are several compelling reasons a competitor may show strong interest in acquiring your business. Most notably, competitors often make the highest offers because of the strategic value your company brings—be it market share, customer base, or operational synergies. For some CEOs, acquiring a rival is as much about eliminating competition as it is about growth.

As part of our process, we develop a carefully curated list of both strategic and financial buyers. This list is reviewed collaboratively with the seller, and sensitive discussions help determine who should or should not be approached. Buyers that pose a significant risk can be excluded entirely, based on mutual agreement between the seller and the advisor. The goal is to maximize value while managing competitive risk with discretion and strategy.

Considerations on Go/No Go

Before deciding whether to approach a strategic competitor as a potential buyer, it's crucial to think beyond the obvious and ask the right questions. While creating a list and discussing options is helpful, these pointed considerations can better assess the potential benefits and risks involved:
  • What industry are you in? This defines how sensitive a competitor sale might be.
  • What is your size relative to theirs? Is it a merger of equals or a minor acquisition?
  • Do you own IP that could make the deal strategically compelling?
  • Would sharing customer or contract information be advantageous—or risky during due diligence?
  • Does the potential premium outweigh the exposure to a direct competitor?
  • What’s your current relationship with the competitor—friendly, neutral, or hostile?
In some cases, selling to a competitor presents little risk—such as when operations differ regionally or by product. If the buyer seeks horizontal or vertical integration, and your offerings don't directly overlap, the fit might be stronger than expected. For commodity-based businesses, the exposure can often be minimized. Still, careful evaluation of each scenario is essential before taking the next step.

NDAs, Employees and Customers

In competitor-driven acquisitions, information requests can escalate quickly—sometimes including sensitive items like patent details, employee rosters (especially in service or staffing firms), and direct client contacts. These requests pose some of the highest risks. Even with well-drafted NDAs or confidentiality agreements, the potential for misuse still exists. That’s why, once outreach to a competitor begins, it's essential to proceed with caution. Proactively questioning the intent behind early information requests—particularly before a Letter of Intent (LOI) or formal due diligence—is a key step in protecting your business.

One Extreme Example

In one case, we worked with a client in the oil & gas industry who was firmly against selling to a competitor. His hesitation delayed the entire transaction by nearly nine months and nearly derailed it altogether. Ironically, his business operated in a commodity-driven market where competitive risk was minimal. Despite this, he excluded a pool of highly strategic and financially capable buyers simply because he labeled them as “competition”—even though they didn’t share any customers. Ultimately, this early decision significantly limited viable deal opportunities.

In another situation, a competing strategic buyer appeared cooperative during pre-LOI discussions but became aggressive during no-shop due diligence. Their intent became clear when they tried to extract valuable strategic information and push the price far below what a financial buyer would have paid. While the deal eventually closed, the process caused avoidable stress and complications for the seller.

These examples illustrate the importance of balancing caution with flexibility when considering competitors as buyers—and the value of thoughtful, well-advised strategy in managing these risks.

The Fine Line to the Double-Edged Sword

Advisors and investment bankers often walk a delicate line when presenting their value to potential sellers. One common challenge is avoiding the tendency to overpromise. We frequently advise sellers that their best chance of securing a premium comes from strategic acquirers. However, this often includes competitors—making it essential to approach those conversations with tact and caution.

On the other end of the spectrum, some M&A advisors outright avoid competitors altogether. While caution is reasonable, in some cases, this rigid stance can be shortsighted—especially when the seller operates in a highly liquid market with strong regional buyer interest. A balanced, case-by-case approach tends to yield better outcomes.

Balance the Risk/Return Trade-offs of Selling to a Competitor

We’re currently working with a client who is deeply resistant to the idea of even conducting “blind” outreach to competitors, fearing it could jeopardize his entire business. This mindset stems from guidance provided by a previous M&A advisor who claimed—quite boldly—that one should never sell to the competition under any circumstance. While a healthy degree of caution is wise, completely avoiding competitors can severely limit opportunities for a successful strategic sale.

In this case, the client operates in a high-volume, low-margin commodity space—an industry where differentiation is minimal and pricing takes precedence. Even if buyers and suppliers learned of a potential sale, it’s unlikely their behavior would change, as loyalty in such markets is often price-driven, not relationship-based. For businesses like his, competitors often represent ideal buyers with aligned interests and strong incentives.

However, for companies with more sensitive or differentiated models, the risks of selling to a competitor are greater. These might include:

  • Technology firms with proprietary IP
  • Staffing agencies, especially those in high-demand fields like software
  • Customer-centric service providers.

In these cases, discretion is critical. If a competitor shows interest, sensitive information should only be shared on a strictly need-to-know basis—and only when it’s essential to valuation. Sellers should remain cautious and deliberate when disclosing confidential data that could harm them if a deal doesn’t close.

Understanding the nature of your business—and the associated risks—can help strike the right balance between opportunity and protection in strategic M&A.

The big question is relevance:

"Will this data help the buyer make a fair and accurate valuation of the business, or could it be misused to gain a competitive edge if the deal falls through?"

Even with NDAs or confidentiality agreements in place, safeguarding your business should always take precedence over simply closing a deal. While selling to a competitor isn’t necessarily a death sentence for your business—especially if they aren’t overly aggressive—it does come with heightened risk. Competitors may have strong incentives to poach your customers or employees, particularly if they operate in the same region or serve similar clients.

The nature of the risk varies by industry. In some cases, disclosing too much too soon can endanger relationships with customers, employees, suppliers, or even the core of your product. That’s why it’s critical to identify your business’s vulnerabilities before entering discussions. Conducting a “worst-case scenario” analysis is often a smart step in preparing for sale.

That said, some of the most promising strategic buyers—and those most willing to pay a premium—are often competitors. Avoiding them altogether could mean missing out on the best opportunity. Just proceed with care, proper planning, and sound advice.

Conclusion

No two deals, business owners, or management teams are ever alike. Every transaction presents its own complexities—even ones that seasoned advisors may find uniquely challenging. Approaching competitors with a blind profile and NDA might not always be the safest path for the long-term health of your business. Then again, in some cases, it might be the smartest move you make. It all depends. Deciding how to engage with competitors requires thoughtful consideration, careful risk assessment, and a well-planned strategy tailored to your specific situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
For any further inquiries or personalized assistance, please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team. We’re here to help and provide the information you need to succeed.
Get in touch
What services does InvestmentBank.com provide?
Which industries does our firm focus on?
Do we represent both buyers and sellers?
How does our firm handle confidentiality during transactions?
What does the typical transaction process look like?
What size of companies do we typically work with?
How are we compensated for our services?
Do we handle international transactions?
How long does a typical engagement take to complete?
How can someone begin working with us?